9.20.2012

[SEQUEL SEPTEMBER] Phantasm II (1988)

DIRECTED BY
Don Coscarelli

STARRING
James LeGros - Mike Pearson
Reggie Bannister - Reggie
Paula Irvine - Elizabeth Reynolds
Angus Scrimm - The Tall Man
Samantha Phillips - Alchemy
Kenneth Tigar - Father Meyers


Genre - Horror/Science Fiction/Suspense/Supernatural

Running Time - 97 Minutes


PLOT
Picking up from 1979's PHANTASM, Reggie (Reggie Bannister) saves Mike (using some archived footage of Michael A. Baldwin) from the grasp of The Tall Man (Angus Scrimm). The two escape through a window before their house explodes, realizing that The Tall Man has escaped as well. This is told to us by a young woman named Liz (Paula Irvine), who seems to share a psychic connection with Mike and knows of the Tall Man's terror.

Seven years pass, and Mike (
James LeGros) is released from the Morningside Psychiatric Clinic when he tells his psychiatrist that he has finally accepted that his experiences with The Tall Man were all in his head. Once he's out, Mike continues his search for The Tall Man by visiting graves and digging up plots to see if there are bodies in them or not. Reggie interrupts Mike, trying to convince him that The Tall Man never existed. Mike lets Reggie take him home, but once there, their house explodes with Reggie's family inside.

Reggie, now upset that The Tall Man has taken more people away from him, decides to fully help Mike stop him once and for all. They drive through several towns, noticing chaos around them as no people are anywhere living in them. The Tall Man is now moving his evil through the United States, while luring Mike into his web at the same time. Reggie and Mike encounter Liz and a hitchhiker named Alchemy (
Samantha Phillips) - who all battle The Tall Man in a massive showdown involving four-barrel guns and flying spheres.



REVIEW



HITS

- The bigger budget and direction. There's a lot of history behind the production of PHANTASM II, a sequel that was nine years in the making at the time. Universal Studios had bought the rights to PHANTASM, which they relinquished when this sequel wasn't a big box office success. Don Coscarelli, now with a big studio backing him up, was offered more money to create his vision in a grander scope - although PHANTASM II was one of Universal's least budgeted horror films at the time. I'll get into the bad stuff about Universal's part in PHANTASM II soon, but at least we got to see better special effects in at least one of these installments.

The gore is pretty cool in this film. This one comes mainly through our favorite friends in these PHANTASM films - the flying spheres. Not only do we get silver spheres, but we get this nasty golden one that seems more sentient than the silver ones. And when they come to play, they do quite a lot of damage. We get a rat being lazered to death. We get the usual sphere drill through the head, which gushes out blood through the other side - either in red or mustard yellow. We also get a great bit where the sphere actually enters someone's body, travels inside, and tries to escape through the person's mouth. Pretty nasty stuff, but cool as well. We also get a scene with a monster coming out of someone's back, speaking like The Tall Man. And did I mention we get like three explosions in this film? Talk about overkill, but the 80s loved their explosions. I thought the make up and special effects were nice here.

As for Don Coscarelli's direction, he handles it well. PHANTASM has always been Coscarelli's pride and joy, even when he was directing more mainstream fare like 1982's BEASTMASTER. The film moves at a quick pace, even during the slower moments in the first hour. I love the locations, especially towards the end with the ghost towns and that creepy funeral parlor. The tension and suspense is good, due to nice editing and framing. I thought the action scenes were handled well. And there was definitely a nod to Sam Raimi here, as many shots were done EVIL DEAD style. I particularly loved the POV shots of the flying spheres, with their heat vision. Very stylish film here that has nods to the original film, but adds newer stuff in. I dug the visuals here.

- The acting. I always dug the acting in the PHANTASM films for the most part, but PHANTASM II works with a small cast and the actors really carry the film well. James LeGros replaces Michael A. Baldwin in the Mike role [which I'll get into shortly] for his first and final appearance in a PHANTASM film. Now known as an indie film darling, I thought LeGros was pretty good as Mike. He may be a bit muscular and good looking to be an adult Mike, but he handles the role well - especially during the final act. I kind of wish Michael A. Baldwin had stayed in the role, only for continuity sakes though. Reggie Bannister is awesome as sidekick Reggie. Here is where the character becomes the hero who kicks major ass and thinks with his small head when it comes to beautiful women. There's a bit of Bruce "Ash" Campbell in the performance, which I didn't mind at all. Bannister plays Reggie a bit tongue-in-check, making the role fun to watch. Paula Irvine was cool as Liz. I bought her act, although her arc with Mike was a hit-and-miss. Samantha Phillips looked hot as Alchemy. She doesn't get to do much other than that, but once she shows her boobs, it didn't really matter. And Angus Scrimm is always awesome as The Tall Man. The man is just a presence, not needing to say much to intimidate people. Cool cast here.

- The shift in tone. The first PHANTASM is a classic piece of horror cinema for many reasons. The biggest one is probably due to how its story was told. Unlike many other horror films at the time, which told its story in a straight forward sort of way, PHANTASM has a dream-like, surreal quality about it that raises more questions than answers. This should piss a lot of people off, but many fans [yours truly included] enjoy trying to unravel the mystery of what PHANTASM is trying to tell both visually and narrative wise. It sets itself apart from other horror films, which is why it gets a ton of respect in the community.


Due to Universal being behind PHANTASM II, the studio wanted Coscarelli to change how the narrative was told for the sequel. Wanting to compete with other horror films that were in the horror market at the time, Universal nixed the whole dream-like deal and wanted the story to make more sense for the mainstream audience. So besides the final moments of PHANTASM II, the rest of the story follows a predictable, familiar template in terms of its narrative. Some fans hated this, as the sequel doesn't attempt to make the narrative mysterious and pretty much tells a linear story that anyone can easily follow and understand.

But I don't really mind it too much. Because of the change, PHANTASM II becomes its own film and doesn't knock off the first film - which is the opposite of what other horror sequels had done at the time. It's a lot more tongue-in-cheek at times, and definitely more action oriented than suspenseful and mysterious like the first film. The first hour is your standard road movie, where characters and locations are established. The last half hour is your action-horror stuff that pretty much resembles the final moments of the first PHANTASM.

Sure, the film is not as interesting or captivating as the first film. But I don't mind the change and the story is told well. Mike and Reggie are still interesting characters, especially Reggie. Mike's psychic connection to The Tall Man and Liz are interesting developments that don't really get answered, which is fine. Reggie is heroic and a bit of a fun horn dog, which gives him a ton of personality. I do feel the Mike and Liz love story is a bit forced, but it's never in your face enough to really bug you. And The Tall Man is great. He's hardly in the film, but he's always casting a shadow over everything. Plus his intentions to move through the country to accomplish his goal is a great development that would become grander in later sequels.

Not everything works, obviously, but when it does, it does it well. PHANTASM II has great moments and introduces story elements that later sequels would focus on. It does everything that a sequel needs to do. And while Coscarelli may have been forced by Universal to turn PHANTASM II into a more mainstream and lighter in tone sequel, he never lets that hinder his storytelling process and takes advantage of the change. This sequel may be less involved than the first film, but it definitely has more fun.


MISSES
- Studio interference. So like I mentioned earlier, Universal Studios bought the rights to make PHANTASM II and made sure to add their two cents in how Coscarelli's story would continue under a major studio. The change in the way the story was told was a major one, but luckily it worked out for the most part. Still, PHANTASM is known for its strange and surreal narratives, which makes PHANTASM II stick out like a sore thumb within the franchise. I think the more linear story is great, but it's not as timeless as the story in the first film, because the film film allows the audience to interpret what they witnessed for themselves. You don't really get that in PHANTASM II, although the story is still well told.

The other major issue came with the casting of the lead actors in PHANTASM II. Don Coscarelli, loyal to his cast & crew and to his continuity, wanted to keep both Michael A. Baldwin and Reggie Bannister on board. However, Universal wanted to replace both actors with more well-known actors so the sequel would sell better for the then-MTV audience. Coscarelli and Universal butted heads over this, to the point that Universal allowed both actors to audition for the roles. REALLY?? Then when they did audition, Universal said that Coscarelli could only pick one to star in the film. Feeling having Reggie Bannister would be more beneficial to the film and that the studio would rather replace the lead role anyway, Coscarelli let Baldwin go. He was eventually replaced by LeGros.

I understand the reasoning for the change from a business standpoint, but I feel this ruined continuity and LeGros, while decent in the role, didn't have the same kind of chemistry with Bannister that Baldwin did in the original. Plus, the addition of LeGros didn't really help the film's box office at all, causing Universal to dump PHANTASM after this - which thankfully allowed Coscarelli to work independently and bring Baldwin back to continue his story for two more sequels. This casting decision would ruin all continuity. Flashbacks to PHANTASM II would have to be reshot just to put Baldwin back in for certain moments. It just made things more complicated when they didn't need to be.


I wish studios would stop interfering into productions more than have to. If it wasn't broke the first time, don't try to fix it. That's all I'm saying.

- That bit with Father Meyers and Liz's family. I understand that Liz's character needed her own arc to explain her reasoning in the film's narrative. But I felt the scene with her grandfather's funeral that involved her grandmother and Father Meyers just ruined the flow and stalled the film a bit for me. It's not bad, but after spending so much time with Mike and Reggie prior to this scene, it feels a bit jarring. Also, I felt the characters other than Liz were just there to be fodder for The Tall Man, while Father Meyers was there to add a good vs. ultimate evil aspect to the film that was already there with Mike and Reggie vs. The Tall Man. And if this scene was meant to explore Liz's character, it didn't really work because I still didn't know much about her besides Liz loving her family and feeling scared of The Tall Man. Like I said, the scene isn't terribly written. But it feels out of place with the rest of the film at that point.

- Alchemy. Besides for the ending and to feed Reggie's libido, I have no idea why this character even exists. Yes, she was hot. Yes, she shows us her nice boobs. Yes, Samantha Phillips wasn't a bad actress. But on a narrative level, she could have been left out and not much besides the ending would have been changed. She was a pleasant distraction visually, but had no place in the story for me.


THINGS I'VE LEARNED WHILE KEEPING THE TALL MAN'S BALLS AWAY FROM MY FACE

- Mike dug up several graves, all with empty plots. Obviously The Undertaker needs room for the bodies of his next opponents at Wrestlemania.

- Mike believes a chainsaw will do more damage to The Tall Man than a shotgun, due to its close range. I guess we now know who wins in that PHANTASM vs. THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE movie.

- Mike and Reggie found a gagged Liz in the corner and in the spotlight. She must have been losing her religion...

- Liz's grandmother freaked out when she saw her dead husband in bed with her. Don't see why she was so scared. He's probably stiffer in all the right places, if you know what I mean...

- A priest was murdered by the flying sphere. I guess he ended up losing his religion too.

- One of The Tall Man's golden flying balls burrorwed inside of a man and then out. Usually the thing attached to the ball does the burrowing, but maybe The Tall Man does things differently in the bedroom.


THE FINAL HOWL
PHANTASM II isn't as good as the first film, but it's still a fun sequel. It has cool gore moments, energetic direction by Don Coscarelli, good acting, and a narrative that takes what was established in the first film and moves it along, rather than repeating what was done before. It does have some unnecessary characters, controversial casting that ruins continuity a bit, and moments in the narrative that ruin the flow a bit - most likely due to studio interference. But it's definitely watchable and a worthy companion piece to the first film.


SCORE
3 Howls Outta 4



3 comments:

  1. In many ways, my favorite of the Phantasm films, it's bigger and better production wise. My favorite scene involves that awesome chainsaw battle between Reggie and one of the Tall Mans minions. Awesome battle! The make up effects were pretty gooey on this one, I loved that, also, a staple of 80's horror.

    Agree, the dream like atmosphere is kind of gone, but still there in a small way, especially as you mentioned in the ending of the film.

    The third and fourth installments also have a female character in them that serves nothing to the plot, espcially part three where we have this girl follow the guys, she knows kung fu, kills a couple of flying spheres...then says "this aint for me, see you guys later!" and literally dissapears from the film?? ha ha..I always thought that was so funny about these films.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It used to be my favorite too when I was younger, but due to personal reasons, I hold the first PHANTASM close to my heart. So for that reason, the sequels don't come close. But I do respect a lot of people loving this one more and I can definitely see why. It's easier to understand, has more action, better gore, and nice boobs. So I don't fault people for enjoying this one more than the first.

      And I agree about the ending - it's the only thing that feels close in tone with the first film.

      And I haven't seen III and OBLIVION in a long while [although I own them on DVD]. But I do remember that chick from III and laughing when she said "Screw this, I'm going home." I never understood why these characters would appear and do nothing. I guess you needed some estrogen in these films or something.

      Delete
  2. Yep! The 80's loved explosions and the Phantasm series loved carsplosions! That, and people being pulled through glass panes! haha!

    ReplyDelete